From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Apr 30 01:59:28 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5F982C9955 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 01:59:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49CJTr26Psz45s7 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 01:59:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.92.3 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1jTyTs-0000zQ-2g; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 03:59:16 +0200 Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 03:59:16 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: "@lbutlr" Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: mail/mailman v3? Message-ID: <20200430015916.GM39563@home.opsec.eu> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49CJTr26Psz45s7 X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.08 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.70)[-0.696,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.39)[-0.389,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12502, ipnet:2001:14f8::/32, country:DE] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 01:59:28 -0000 Hi! > On 28 Apr 2020, at 14:00, Chris wrote: > > as at *least* it completely abandons the previous archive system. > > Pipermail was??? lacking. It looked 20 years old (because it was). > > > Making your previous archive, an archive of an archive. > > AIUI you can move your entire archive to the new system. There are many thousand links to the freebsd pipermail archives, and invalidating all those links sounds like a serious loss of institutional memory. Is there a way to cope with that ? Some sort of lookup 'old link' -> 'new link' ? -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 Now what ?