From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org  Thu Feb  4 11:07:05 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B524A9CD22
 for <freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Thu,  4 Feb 2016 11:07:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru)
Received: from zxy.spb.ru (zxy.spb.ru [195.70.199.98])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CBC21434;
 Thu,  4 Feb 2016 11:07:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru)
Received: from slw by zxy.spb.ru with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD))
 (envelope-from <slw@zxy.spb.ru>)
 id 1aRHkb-0006Hy-I7; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 14:07:01 +0300
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 14:07:01 +0300
From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru>
To: Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org>
Cc: Konstantin Belousov <kib@freebsd.org>,
 Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org,
 Mateusz Guzik <mjg@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fork: pass arguments to fork1 in a dedicated structure
Message-ID: <20160204110701.GB88527@zxy.spb.ru>
References: <20160201103632.GL91220@kib.kiev.ua>
 <1454386069-29657-1-git-send-email-mjguzik@gmail.com>
 <1454386069-29657-2-git-send-email-mjguzik@gmail.com>
 <20160202131145.GT91220@kib.kiev.ua>
 <1454423299.11162.27.camel@freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1454423299.11162.27.camel@freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: slw@zxy.spb.ru
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zxy.spb.ru); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
 <freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 11:07:05 -0000

On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 07:28:19AM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote:

> > Would be great to not use initializer in declaration, i.e. use
> > bzero()
> > instead of c99 designated initializers.
> 
> This would be a better suggestion if the compiler recognized and
> optimized bzero() with inline code like it does for those forbidden
> assignments.

This is imposible until bzero() is nonstandart and implemeted in
seperate file.