From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 5 14:59:56 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1D1016A4CE for ; Thu, 5 May 2005 14:59:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84E5D43D49 for ; Thu, 5 May 2005 14:59:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5013D64DE03; Thu, 5 May 2005 11:59:54 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 78110-03; Thu, 5 May 2005 14:59:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-222-81-172.eastlink.ca [24.222.81.172]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E65ED64DDFC; Thu, 5 May 2005 11:59:53 -0300 (ADT) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6086235778; Thu, 5 May 2005 11:59:52 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F54133E52; Thu, 5 May 2005 11:59:52 -0300 (ADT) Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 11:59:52 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Eirik =?ISO-8859-1?B?2A==?=verby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20050505115903.K42300@ganymede.hub.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-753026097-1115305192=:42300" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org cc: "stable@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Current status of nullfs and/or unionfs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 14:59:56 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --0-753026097-1115305192=:42300 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On Thu, 5 May 2005, Eirik [ISO-8859-1] =D8verby wrote: > The solution, or at least parts of it, would be to have certain parts of= =20 > the jail filesystems mounted in via nullfs (acceptable solution) or=20 > unionfs (ideal solution). However, ever since FreeBSD 4.10 this has been= =20 > a major problem, as both filesystems started exhibiting major stability= =20 > and data integrity issues. I'm running 4.11 with ~90 mount/jails running on two of our servers ...=20 haven't noticed any stability problems ... what are you seeing? ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 --0-753026097-1115305192=:42300--