From owner-freebsd-doc Mon Apr 8 15:52:01 1996 Return-Path: owner-doc Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id PAA09244 for doc-outgoing; Mon, 8 Apr 1996 15:52:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from antares.aero.org (antares.aero.org [130.221.192.46]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA09197 Mon, 8 Apr 1996 15:51:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from anpiel.aero.org by antares.aero.org (4.1/AMS-1.0) id AA09617 for freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org; Mon, 8 Apr 96 15:51:08 PDT Message-Id: <9604082251.AA09617@antares.aero.org> To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) Cc: jmb@freefall.freebsd.org (Jonathan M. Bresler), freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org, doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Archive Anaconda Tape drive 1.35GB && Adaptec 1542CF In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 07 Apr 1996 01:52:44 PST." <199604070952.LAA17288@uriah.heep.sax.de> Date: Mon, 08 Apr 1996 15:51:00 -0700 From: "Mike O'Brien" Sender: owner-doc@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Perhaps we should start a ``Tape drive FAQ''? Many people are > confused about the different tape drives, their subtleties (like for > the Anaconda, or the switches on the HP-DAT), their relative technical > merits, and the status and quality of FreeBSD supporting the different > kinds of drives. I'll drink to that. I have never gotten my Colorado Jumbo 350 to work under FreeBSD (I'm up to 2.1R now), yet others apparently use them for backups regularly. I'm baffled, but no longer frustrated since I borrowed a SCSI tape drive. DOS backups are still done on the Colorado since I have no DOS SCSI tape backup software (and because the price/performance on the Colorado is so much better). Mike O'Brien