From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 23 06:26:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6EF410656BB; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 06:26:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ota@j.email.ne.jp) Received: from mail1.asahi-net.or.jp (mail1.asahi-net.or.jp [202.224.39.197]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87DE78FC1E; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 06:26:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ota@j.email.ne.jp) Received: from localhost (pool-70-20-228-87.phil.east.verizon.net [70.20.228.87]) by mail1.asahi-net.or.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8626A61B39; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:06:09 +0900 (JST) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 01:06:04 -0500 From: Yoshihiro Ota To: Steve Wills , Daichi GOTO Message-Id: <20090223010604.fd404e45.ota@j.email.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: <499FCAD4.8000006@freebsd.org> References: <95E82F15-2535-4C67-BDF0-44CFC7EB9FBB@mouf.net> <499FCAD4.8000006@freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i386-portbld-freebsd7.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Masanori OZAWA Subject: Re: unionfs panic in 7.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 06:26:30 -0000 On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 18:35:16 +0900 Daichi GOTO wrote: > Steve Wills wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've found an reproducable panic in unionfs on 7.1-R. > > > > /usr/src/sys/fs/unionfs/union_subr.c is: > > $FreeBSD: src/sys/fs/unionfs/union_subr.c,v 1.92.2.7.2.2 2008/12/15 > > 03:58:55 daichi Exp $ > > > > kgdb output is below. > > > > I reproduce this by unionfs mounting a ports dir used by the ports > > tinderbox. If anyone would like more info, please let me know, I have > > the core around, and can reproduce, help debug, resend in case my mailer > > has mangled this, etc. > > I have some research around that issue. > > First I should say, I cannot judge that unionfs leads > that problem or not. JIMO, I guess that is not depends > on unionfs itself. Very similar panis is reported without > unionfs. At least, I cannot figure out what is the main > cause of this problem. sorry. I wonder if it is one of LORs, http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/lor.html If you can try on 8-CURRENT and reproduce, it may provide you better info. Regards, Hiro