From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jul 21 16:13:41 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01C46BA0996 for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 16:13:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C639D1C9A for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 16:13:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1A98207AF for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 12:13:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 21 Jul 2016 12:13:39 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zyxst.net; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=AMmzJfnxDiIQd0mVeWz8bTlEzR8=; b=leSZ2o azvhgQkZPdmq/WLct7c4xbR8T3WmeNoP2qMTTjyalCD2rIO9TpyN/Y3JwoGRLRCB l3CzuR6cIk0vxqpUjLp0MeXK2gP63A7IcaL7nmRkloHWZBSZydGIGaoy/C32hRam Tb2b+3WWLWaQGvPbfQ2AW6mOSq/vJdETPKS2s= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=AMmzJfnxDiIQd0m VeWz8bTlEzR8=; b=LcxztScevRj5NepHwTttd1UsUH1RQ3tO1s9INN3s1OJXomE /Fm9CLNV8A8c5na4e/VKX68mUhiTMSRWZjzbFXYLmMoT+ORzNt8bpedb2aRrtCwI HXjC21lOJl0C5tLK/B450M5KameZlU2A+ytsYwZlenFccHwwmHg/D1/DZfok= X-Sasl-enc: mtdMnWS5+Izxh/ILq59wvp5UzA/a9u6PrI5SRprkQykn 1469117619 Received: from pumpkin.growveg.org (potato.growveg.org [82.70.91.102]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6E1BAF29FB for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 12:13:39 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: stunnel fails to build To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <57d3d4e8-ed5b-ee6d-073e-81b7fe1afb30@zyxst.net> From: tech-lists Message-ID: <8a5d48e8-fa5c-5cd2-f209-2d634b6b7723@zyxst.net> Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 17:13:32 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 16:13:41 -0000 On 07/21/16 11:29, Dewayne Geraghty wrote: > After reading about your issue, I updated all of my ports, via svnlite, and > successfully built on yesterday's fresh FreeBSD 10.3 Stable for i386 using > openssl. Unfortunately on the amd64, which uses libressl, I receive: > ===> stunnel-5.35,1 may not be packaged: The stunnel license restricts > distribution when linked to non-OpenSSL non-base SSL-libraries. (A recent > enhancement) > > My customisations are: > i386 uses make.conf entry: ssl=openssl > amd64 uses make.conf: ssl=libressl > This may be significant to your situation? > > If there is a problem with the Makefile, please log a PR so everyone can > benefit. ;) I dunno if there's a problem with the makefile or with the software as suggested amendments had no effect. The "stunnel may not be packaged" message is one related to distribution and is not a problem with compilation per se. thanks, -- J.