Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 12:40:15 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Jonathan McKeown <j.mckeown@ru.ac.za> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Training wheels for commandline (was Re: Pull in upstream before 9.1 code freeze?) Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207051238510.4337@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <201207051215.44799.j.mckeown@ru.ac.za> References: <CA%2BQLa9B-Dm-=hQCrbEgyfO4sKZ5aG72_PEFF9nLhyoy4GRCGrA@mail.gmail.com> <20120705082857.GB37083@server.rulingia.com> <4FF55864.8040807@FreeBSD.org> <201207051215.44799.j.mckeown@ru.ac.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> comparison to Clippy). I don't think suggesting that someone who wants to use > a system learn how it works is elitist; and I don't object to optional tools it is normal way of using any system. And actually possible with FreeBSD In 21 century knowing ANYTHING is elitist anyway ;) > No. I think this is entirely the wrong way round. If the new feature is > created and you want it, turn it on. Don't make me turn off something I Correct. No feature that do something "over the curtain" should be active by default. period.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1207051238510.4337>