From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Feb 14 08:26:22 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84B9A106564A
	for <freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:26:22 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com (mail-wi0-f182.google.com
	[209.85.212.182])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 193048FC0A
	for <freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:26:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wibhn14 with SMTP id hn14so6230959wib.13
	for <freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:26:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
	:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
	bh=aGrv+PL/VgTf58BjxmdKRYB12mylT44uKfE/juaZYo8=;
	b=TfUkS/mkm7YMoPdzQjwapCtC39YSPEXBL6BfTcbDq17rDfAGvvI6qO7nQb37ptZLMN
	ZMI3m2i+LrJ5ZhkqFQXEZ7eiIS6Xe/TAEZ9seRltbOHSiwoIZJrQTF+BOPNjSa0Gzp75
	0Vbwg177fnzvOJTFwSeyF5dcBNqQcRkB8cCxM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.180.78.6 with SMTP id x6mr1981504wiw.18.1329207981054; Tue, 14
	Feb 2012 00:26:21 -0800 (PST)
Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com
Received: by 10.216.175.136 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:26:21 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CA+sBSoKCFzntOBKw-OsT2FxFkhhTsc7PAnsTns-6EHhkmjfbQQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+sBSoKCFzntOBKw-OsT2FxFkhhTsc7PAnsTns-6EHhkmjfbQQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:26:21 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: asoIcm1Zw0cqphnhRyjIBOBuBXQ
Message-ID: <CAJ-VmomRZ0KDHxTRnUJ=zcbHvxtHxZeKxJgYvbCS2ZdDbbgaqg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
To: Monthadar Al Jaberi <monthadar@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Fragment number of first fragment != 0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack,
	tools device driver development." <freebsd-wireless.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-wireless-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-wireless>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-wireless-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-wireless-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:26:22 -0000

Lemme check into this a little more..


adrian

On 14 February 2012 00:19, Monthadar Al Jaberi <monthadar@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found that in FreeBSD current the first fragment will have a
> fragment number = 1 in function ieee80211_fragment.
>
> But according to 802.11-2007, 9.4 Fragmentation page 279:
> "...The fragments shall be sent in order of lowest fragment number to
> highest fragment
> number, where the fragment number value starts at zero, ..."
>
> This also holds on the 802.11-2011 draft 12:
> "The fragment number is set to 0 in the first or only fragment of an
> MSDU or MMPDU and is
> incremented by one for each successive fragment of that MSDU or MMPDU."
>
> I checked Linux 3.3-rc3 code and there I see them having a check on rx side
> if (frag == 0) { /* This is the first fragment of a new frame. */
> and on tx side they put:
> fragnum = 0;
>
> On Madwifi 0.9.4 in function ieee80211_encap:
> fragnum = 0;
>
> So should we change our fragno to be 0?
>
> br,
>
> --
> Monthadar Al Jaberi
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-wireless-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"