From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 28 12:10:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64E121D6; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 12:10:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kpaasial@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-f171.google.com (mail-we0-f171.google.com [74.125.82.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD3E38FC14; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 12:10:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f171.google.com with SMTP id u3so4751603wey.2 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 04:10:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=hV+0Zc5dJuL1A9v9KxceMrn8IGhgTNLdXJHQhO6N3hc=; b=CshHMQQ+aFRxGgAzu7PNCZ/qsByV0Mg1T5BdoA6JmOMfw/IK96r3FT6kTWNQBe+oIL C5MZ5D24IuhetQQFKyq0oHjQZz00MVd9gRmtfNnPTXumTw1Hbd+33rpk2AQSewk137+r U+TLh0ZXYgHsT9wvWIskHaIcUV+Dpl0KRnkkbzMHSDR+RD+N9DswDWkMfw5LDKwv+U0a qe/RpYlNgzHjkROOgJoS5HDTxF1+MWhgZuEVqHG3q83c9e9eOt9DyFbqCN9aJlzRWXfz YhYhWDYGTHe9CiG/N4OlVJX0bRLIiOzHbx1PUXvspXTO3269gjUuJbBPPppMAC0BK3DR +O3A== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.23.37 with SMTP id j5mr53282819wjf.28.1356696647091; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 04:10:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.172.197 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 04:10:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1356628066796-5772624.post@n5.nabble.com> Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 14:10:46 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 9.1-RC3: xorg-input-mouse, xfce4-panel From: Kimmo Paasiala To: CeDeROM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Jakub Lach , freebsd-ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 12:10:54 -0000 On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 2:08 PM, CeDeROM wrote: > On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: >> It doesn't look like the FreeBSD ports SVN repository is used to its >> full potential. (...) > > Yea, btw why FreeBSD does not use GIT? I have been using it for some > time and I have not seen better source code revision utility. GIT is > really amazing, SVN/CVS seems to be a file revision control, while GIT > is the source code revision control, this tool surprises me all the > time with its great features :-) > > -- > CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info I would personally use GIT but I'm ok with SVN too. I absolutely hate CVS :P My point is really that why not centralise all the development that happens around the ports tree. The infrastructure is there already. -Kimmo