Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 01 Apr 2017 16:04:24 -0700
From:      Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com>
To:        Mathieu Arnold <mat@mat.cc>
Cc:        Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org>, Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com>, Jason Unovitch <junovitch@FreeBSD.org>, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r416439 - head/sysutils/fusefs-ntfs
Message-ID:  <201704012304.v31N4OID037131@slippy.cwsent.com>
In-Reply-To: Message from Mathieu Arnold <mat@mat.cc> of "Sun, 02 Apr 2017 00:01:25 %2B0200." <d4a6997a-b5ae-f368-5843-cb0f7596c223@mat.cc>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <d4a6997a-b5ae-f368-5843-cb0f7596c223@mat.cc>, Mathieu Arnold 
writes
:
> Le 01/04/2017 à 23:58, Jan Beich a écrit :
> > Mathieu Arnold <mat@mat.cc> writes:
> >
> >> Le 01/04/2017 à 22:20, Cy Schubert a écrit :
> >>
> >>> In message <201606052250.u55Mo44E016592@repo.freebsd.org>, Jason Unovitch
>  
> >>> write
> >>> s:
> >>>> Author: junovitch
> >>>> Date: Sun Jun  5 22:50:04 2016
> >>>> New Revision: 416439
> >>>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/416439
> >>>>
> >>>> Log:
> >>>>   sysutils/fusefs-ntfs: pass MAINTAINER to submitter
> >>>>   
> >>>>   PR:		209976
> >>>>   Submitted by:	Dušan Vejnovič <freebsd@dussan.org>
> >>> Is there a reason we grant maintainer on a simple maintainer request? It 
> >>> used to be that a MAINTAINER was given maintainership only when a patch w
> as 
> >>> submitted not a patch to just change MAINTAINER. Has this policy changed?
> >> The policy has not changed, those commits should not happen, but, well,
> >> they do.
> > Where is this policy documented? I'm sure I've made the same mistake
> > more than once in the past.
> 
> I'm not sure it penciled down, we try to not commit only maintainer
> changes, but require patches that actually update the port.

I recall it being discussed on the mailing lists a number of times. It 
probably should be written down somewhere. (Kind of like at $JOB where 
standards are agreed upon but not written down in the ops guide or on 
scarepoint.


-- 
Cheers,
Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com>
FreeBSD UNIX:  <cy@FreeBSD.org>   Web:  http://www.FreeBSD.org

	The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few.





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201704012304.v31N4OID037131>