From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 7 09:36:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 856532A4; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 09:36:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erwin@mail.droso.net) Received: from mail.droso.net (koala.droso.dk [213.239.220.246]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44B4F21E9; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 09:36:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.droso.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8F5EA1942; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 11:35:54 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 11:35:54 +0200 From: Erwin Lansing To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] Staging, packaging and more Message-ID: <20131007093554.GW82824@droso.dk> References: <524DD120.4000701@freebsd.org> <20131003203501.GA1371@medusa.sysfault.org> <20131004061833.GA1367@medusa.sysfault.org> <20131004063259.GC72453@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <524E679B.9010103@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20131004070503.GF72453@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <524EB31C.6060102@quip.cz> <20131004132945.GL72453@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <524FE297.3030705@quip.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <524FE297.3030705@quip.cz> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD/amd64 9.1-RELEASE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 09:36:02 -0000 On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 11:57:43AM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > I don't think it's about building ports. It's about the list of what I > need to have installed and maintained on our systems. And with this > split to more packages, then the list will grow and tracking of changes > and dependencies will become hell like on Linux distributions. > Exactly why I proposed to have the full package be the default and have the split packages as options for those who want it. For you, it will still only be one package to install and include the things you are used to today, binaries, libraries, etc., but for those who want can install just the separate packages. Erwin -- Erwin Lansing http://droso.dk erwin@FreeBSD.org http:// www.FreeBSD.org