Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 10:51:55 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 258536] Mk/bsd.lto.mk: Add Link-Time Optimization (LTO) support Message-ID: <bug-258536-7788-rmNlWl2w47@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-258536-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-258536-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D258536 Anton Saietskii <vsasjason@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vsasjason@gmail.com --- Comment #12 from Anton Saietskii <vsasjason@gmail.com> --- I'm unsure if closed PR is the best fit for asking, but let's at least try = as LTO is really wanted feature for me: 1. When LTO enabled, is it still worth to use ccache? 2. Is there a way to enable LTO cache? (https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ThinLTO.html#incremental) 3. Can one enable no. 3 in poudriere? 4. Can one set linker threads same way as MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER? (Especially for poudriere since it's expected that each jail use only 1 CPU by default.) 5. And, finally, are there any plans to test/enable LTO for base system? If this isn't right place for such questions =E2=80=94 I would be grateful = for a suggestion where to ask. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-258536-7788-rmNlWl2w47>