From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 15 17:59:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8818516A400 for ; Sat, 15 Apr 2006 17:59:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.ntplx.net (mail.ntplx.net [204.213.176.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2625143D45 for ; Sat, 15 Apr 2006 17:59:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11]) by mail.ntplx.net (8.13.6/8.13.6/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id k3FHxmo0006805; Sat, 15 Apr 2006 13:59:48 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 13:59:48 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net To: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20060415.113630.81407700.imp@bsdimp.com> Message-ID: References: <20060414182846.GA702@pato.euesrg02.net> <20060415.113630.81407700.imp@bsdimp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.ntplx.net) Cc: victor@bsdes.net, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Missing dependencies on shared libraries X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Eischen List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 17:59:57 -0000 On Sat, 15 Apr 2006, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: > Daniel Eischen writes: > : On Fri, 14 Apr 2006, Victor Balada Diaz wrote: > : > : > Hi, > : > I found that ldd doesn't report libc as a dependency on most (all?) > : > libraries: > : > > : > pato> ldd /usr/lib/libfetch.so > : > /usr/lib/libfetch.so: > : > libssl.so.3 => /usr/lib/libssl.so.3 (0x4816a000) > : > libcrypto.so.3 => /lib/libcrypto.so.3 (0x48198000) > : > > : > does anyone know why? > : > : AFAIK, it's being worked on. It's not just libc either, -pthread > : also has to start linking to libpthread. > > We don't record libc dependencies into shared libraries right now. If > we did, that would create some problems and solve some problems. With > symbol versioning, it most likely will become moot, since we'll never > have to bump libc major version again... kan stated he was working on doing this, which is what I was referring to above. -- DE