From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org  Fri Sep 23 13:34:35 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA19BBE7B8A
 for <freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Fri, 23 Sep 2016 13:34:35 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from moiseev@mezonplus.ru)
Received: from mx.mezonplus.ru (mx.mezonplus.ru [91.211.181.139])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73962C81
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 13:34:34 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from moiseev@mezonplus.ru)
Received: from [192.168.0.102] (time.mezon.local [192.168.0.2])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx.mezonplus.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DD90C61F8C
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 16:26:20 +0300 (MSK)
Subject: Re: Differences when using `make` V `port test`
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
References: <CAGKJJVnDPx5YXQxMdjkbKSjeTETsBfsMtd-0Nnem58=F0x_1Pw@mail.gmail.com>
 <3ef6ea87-0a2c-e87e-66e2-535c11d01ed1@FreeBSD.org>
From: Alexander Moisseev <moiseev@mezonplus.ru>
Message-ID: <2177a1e7-fa9f-4707-5a6b-7b0bd01b02af@mezonplus.ru>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 16:26:19 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.0a1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3ef6ea87-0a2c-e87e-66e2-535c11d01ed1@FreeBSD.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: ru-English
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mezonplus.ru;
 s=dkim; t=1474637181;
 h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references;
 bh=sTCfndQWKcpaeAr4IeGGlfIveTOdQ6nz/TbufFyBQ00=;
 b=wVRa3U2IkHAP9MLCA8LM+/LppO9OsIOuuz4Y90IHrV7j+Q0mqba3TNuvhjSD8Wj+qREBSE
 BKZtIgVUQhMQEbRFciNRSN2dhh7soHfkB/tIdxuW33uw4tT+jIYAZddTNTYAsuancXYXJC
 qv4RAIC1mQ4uHvl6GGokORXcEi4HMT0=
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 13:34:35 -0000

On 23.09.2016 15:45, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>
> I don't really know what it does, but to test a port, it seems
> overcomplicated, everything is already done by the framework.
>
> Best would be for you to put:
>
> DEVELOPER=yes
>
> in /etc/make.conf
>
> and simply run "make" as a regular user, it will check everything that
> can be.
>
I believe the most important difference is "port test" does real install (into a temp dir) and deinstall, "make" doesn't (merely staging).