From owner-freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org  Thu Apr 28 06:21:40 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E446B1FB46
 for <freebsd-amd64@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Thu, 28 Apr 2016 06:21:40 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F2A4144E
 for <freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 06:21:40 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u3S6LecE060822
 for <freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 06:21:40 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 208267] if_sfxge unstable causes panic at ifconfig sfxge0 up
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 06:21:40 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System
X-Bugzilla-Component: kern
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-BETA2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People
X-Bugzilla-Who: commit-hook@freebsd.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: arybchik@freebsd.org
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-208267-6-R0n7miL9bl@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-208267-6@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-208267-6@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:22:52 +0000
X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform <freebsd-amd64.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-amd64>,
 <mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-amd64/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64>,
 <mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 06:21:40 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D208267

--- Comment #6 from commit-hook@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:

Author: arybchik
Date: Thu Apr 28 06:20:43 UTC 2016
New revision: 298735
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/298735

Log:
  sfxge(4): do not use RxQ index as label

  Labels are limitted by 32 on EF10. It is not sufficient on powerful hosts.
  Since only one RxQ is running over each EvQ, zero label may be used.

  Reviewed by:    gnn
  Sponsored by:   Solarflare Communications, Inc.
  MFC after:      2 days
  PR:             208267
  Differential Revision:  https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6121

Changes:
  head/sys/dev/sfxge/sfxge_ev.c
  head/sys/dev/sfxge/sfxge_rx.c

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=