From owner-freebsd-security  Mon Jan 27 04:29:53 1997
Return-Path: <owner-security>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id EAA04126
          for security-outgoing; Mon, 27 Jan 1997 04:29:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from homeport.org (lighthouse.homeport.org [205.136.65.198])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id EAA04110
          for <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 27 Jan 1997 04:29:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: (adam@localhost) by homeport.org (8.6.9/8.6.9) id HAA24267; Mon, 27 Jan 1997 07:25:14 -0500
From: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
Message-Id: <199701271225.HAA24267@homeport.org>
Subject: Re: sendmail running non-root SUCCESS!
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970126174158.20505B-100000@www.trifecta.com> from Dev Chanchani at "Jan 26, 97 05:45:28 pm"
To: dev@trifecta.com (Dev Chanchani)
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 1997 07:25:13 -0500 (EST)
Cc: lithium@cia-g.com, schluntz@pinpt.com, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG,
        roberto@keltia.freenix.fr
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL27 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-security@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Dev Chanchani wrote:

| BTW: Does anyone know if you can use sendmail-like rewriting rules that 
| allow you to accept mail for various virtual domains with qmail?

	You can not.  Handling virtual domains with qmail requires no
sendmail like rewriting rules--its much simpler. ;)

Adam


-- 
"It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once."
					               -Hume