From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jul 16 11:29:24 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E24F37B401
	for <arch@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:29:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from builder.freebsdmall.com (builder.freebsdmall.com
	[65.86.180.18])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6479A43F93
	for <arch@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:29:23 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from murray@builder.freebsdmall.com)
Received: (from root@localhost)
	by builder.freebsdmall.com (8.12.9/8.11.6) id h6GITMoB029327;
	Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:29:22 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from murray)
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:29:21 -0700
From: Murray Stokely <murray@freebsdmall.com>
To: Martin Blapp <mb@imp.ch>
Message-ID: <20030716112921.I215@freebsdmall.com>
References: <20030716131921.B9588@cvs.imp.ch>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
In-Reply-To: <20030716131921.B9588@cvs.imp.ch>;
	from mb@imp.ch on Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 01:25:09PM +0200
X-GPG-Key-ID: 1024D/0E451F7D
X-GPG-Key-Fingerprint: E2CA 411D DD44 53FD BB4B  3CB5 B4D7 10A2 0E45 1F7D
cc: arch@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: dhclient-patch and ISC
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture
	<freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 18:29:24 -0000

On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 01:25:09PM +0200, Martin Blapp wrote:
> It seems that the development in the ISC-dhcpd is progressing very
> slowly.

Yes, it is.

> Isn't there any way to include my (rather important) patch before 5.2 ?
> I'm even happy if I can commit it to 6.0, but just wait another year is
> a long time.

Yes, I think it's worth just committting it and taking files off the
vendor branch, if necessary.  I thought I gave you my support to
commit it to our tree months ago.

       - Murray