Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 02:16:03 -0600 From: "@lbutlr" <kremels@kreme.com> To: Mark Millard via freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Dovecot packages Message-ID: <9C152311-2B3D-495D-A15A-A75F253AC26B@kreme.com> In-Reply-To: <68339DB5-BBEF-4C5C-A655-06E508BE4BAE@mail.sermon-archive.info> References: <68339DB5-BBEF-4C5C-A655-06E508BE4BAE@mail.sermon-archive.info>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 22 May 2019, at 16:41, Doug Hardie <bc979@lafn.org> wrote:
> It appears that the dovecot package is now the one that is maintained =
and dovecot2 package has remained stagnant. =20
You didn't replace your port tree when you upgraded to 12.0-RELEASE.
I think that portsnap fetch extract ensures your ports tree matches the =
current ports.
Ah, yes, from the man -8 portsnap:
extract Extract a ports tree, replacing existing files and
directories. NOTE: This will remove anything =
occupying the
location where files or directories are being =
extracted; in
particular, any changes made locally to the ports tree =
(for
example, adding new patches) will be silently =
obliterated.
=3D=3D=3D>
Only run this command to initialize your =
portsnap-maintained
ports tree for the first time, if you wish to start =
over
with a clean, completely unmodified tree, or if you =
wish to
extract a specific part of the tree (using the path =
option).
=3D=3D=3D>
--=20
Whoever had created humanity had left in a major design flaw. It was its
tendency to bend at the knees. --Feet of Clay
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9C152311-2B3D-495D-A15A-A75F253AC26B>