Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2000 17:36:23 +0100 From: Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de> To: Thomas David Rivers <rivers@dignus.com> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: mktime(3) and strange struct tm entries Message-ID: <20000107173623.B4381@cichlids.cichlids.com> In-Reply-To: <200001071628.LAA76267@lakes.dignus.com>; from rivers@dignus.com on Fri, Jan 07, 2000 at 11:28:48AM -0500 References: <19991231171423.A4219@cichlids.cichlids.com> <200001071628.LAA76267@lakes.dignus.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thus spake Thomas David Rivers (rivers@dignus.com):
> I believe this is correct behaviour.
Ok. I got a further question:
From ctime(3):
til tm_mon and tm_year are determined. Mktime() returns the specified
calendar time; if the calendar time cannot be represented, it returns -1;
Which calendar time is meant?
IMO November 31th is void and cannot be represented.
Alex
--
I doubt, therefore I might be.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000107173623.B4381>