From owner-freebsd-current Fri Apr 30 14:46:59 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from cygnus.rush.net (cygnus.rush.net [209.45.245.133]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67E3F15946 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 1999 14:46:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bright@rush.net) Received: from localhost (bright@localhost) by cygnus.rush.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id RAA29258; Fri, 30 Apr 1999 17:05:44 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 17:05:42 -0500 (EST) From: Alfred Perlstein To: obrien@NUXI.com Cc: John Polstra , sprice@hiwaay.net, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: (FWD) Re: Progs linked against libstdc++ dead... In-Reply-To: <19990430114829.B95710@nuxi.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 30 Apr 1999, David O'Brien wrote: > > These are good questions, and I don't know enough yet about the issues > > surrounding vtable thunks to answer them. > > I haven't had time to really dig into this yet. Hopefully Saturday. I'm > about to revert the change until I can see what the problem is and what > the upgrade issues will be. EGCS 1.2 *should* be out in the July/Aug > time frame. Of course I will try to upgrade us to it (well 1.2.1 which I > figure will quickly follow). The EGCS maintainers are pushing to get > vtable thunks working properly for 1.2. > > Since the Linux config files specify DEFALUT_VTABLE_THUNKS=1, no one has > posted a bug report related to them, there is an option to turn them off, > and this *is* -CURRENT. I may just leave them turned on by default. > > Opinions? *gritting teeth* bring it on! :) -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message