Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 16:22:25 +0300 From: Dmitry Sivachenko <demon@FreeBSD.org> To: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-python@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Libffi Dependency Message-ID: <EDBAE8DD-E945-4070-B1CB-2B0479A06BD8@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <201410280501.s9S510vl025204@slippy.cwsent.com> References: <201410280501.s9S510vl025204@slippy.cwsent.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 28 =D0=BE=D0=BA=D1=82. 2014 =D0=B3., at 8:01, Cy Schubert = <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com> wrote: >=20 > Hi, >=20 > Would anyone care to check this out and would anyone object to this = being=20 > committed? Basically this enables optional (default) dependency on=20 > devel/libffi instead of libffi shipped within the python tarballs. The=20= > default is to use devel/libffi however the user can opt to use the ffi=20= > delivered with each python tarball. Comments? Ojbections? >=20 I committed your patch for python34 for now to fix i386 build. Let's see how it goes before merging it for other python version. Thanks.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?EDBAE8DD-E945-4070-B1CB-2B0479A06BD8>