From owner-freebsd-bugs Thu Jan 14 17:17:27 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA17912 for freebsd-bugs-outgoing; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 17:17:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from gjp.erols.com (alex-va-n008c079.moon.jic.com [206.156.18.89]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA17907 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 17:17:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gjp@gjp.erols.com) Received: from gjp.erols.com (localhost.erols.com [127.0.0.1]) by gjp.erols.com (8.9.1/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA79026; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 20:15:52 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gjp@gjp.erols.com) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.1 12/23/97 To: davids@nswcc.org.au cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG From: "Gary Palmer" Subject: Re: Y2K compliance question In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 15 Jan 1999 09:56:38 +1100." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 20:15:52 -0500 Message-ID: <79022.916362952@gjp.erols.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org david schanzer wrote in message ID : > We are running three servers using FreeBSD v2.0. Yes, I know it's a very old > version. Is version 2.0 Y2K compliant, and if not, what is the minimum > version for which your statement, "After extensive analysis and testing, we > believe that FreeBSD is 100% Y2K compliant", is true? FreeBSD 2.0 was not tested. We strongly suggest upgrading your servers to 2.2.8, preferably 2.2-stable. Gary -- Gary Palmer FreeBSD Core Team Member FreeBSD: Turning PC's into workstations. See http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/ for info To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message