From owner-freebsd-current Sat Mar 30 11:09:50 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id LAA29007 for current-outgoing; Sat, 30 Mar 1996 11:09:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu (halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu [18.26.0.159]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA28992 for ; Sat, 30 Mar 1996 11:09:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu; (5.65/1.1.8.2/19Aug95-0530PM) id AA17247; Sat, 30 Mar 1996 14:09:29 -0500 Date: Sat, 30 Mar 1996 14:09:29 -0500 From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <9603301909.AA17247@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> To: graichen@omega.physik.fu-berlin.de (Thomas Graichen) Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: We need to do another XFree86 release for -current someday soon.. Newsgroups: local.freebsd-current In-Reply-To: <4jj01t$1mv@mordillo.physik.fu-berlin.de> References: <199603291819.MAA24109@compound> <4jj01t$1mv@mordillo.physik.fu-berlin.de> Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk < Tony Kimball (alk@Think.COM) wrote: > : From: Garrett Wollman > : Date: Fri, 29 Mar 1996 10:04:24 -0500 > : > Why do ns_addr() and iso_addr() have to go? What's the big deal? > : Because the network address families they supported are no longer > : shipped, and thus they won't compile any more. > : Please, that isn't good enough to justify the cost. Stub them to > : return errors. > i would vote for this too There isn't anything to vote on; you're a month too late. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | Shashish is simple, it's discreet, it's brief. ... wollman@lcs.mit.edu | Shashish is the bonding of hearts in spite of distance. Opinions not those of| It is a bond more powerful than absence. We like people MIT, LCS, ANA, or NSA| who like Shashish. - Claude McKenzie + Florent Vollant