From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 19 12:00:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A72BE16A4E3 for ; Wed, 19 May 2004 12:00:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8B2B43D48 for ; Wed, 19 May 2004 12:00:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i4JJ0muo087833; Wed, 19 May 2004 23:00:48 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 23:00:48 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20040518220007.GA35570@xor.obsecurity.org> Message-ID: <20040519225920.V86578@woozle.rinet.ru> References: <20040518152749.M52881@woozle.rinet.ru> <20040518220007.GA35570@xor.obsecurity.org> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports subtree dependencies checking X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 19:00:50 -0000 On Tue, 18 May 2004, Kris Kennaway wrote: KK> > as all of you knows, keeping up to date thw whole ports tree involves KK> > tremendous number of disk operation per cvs/cvsup. So, I use small script to KK> > keep up-to date rather small set of ports (less than 1000, comparing to 10k+ KK> > total ports in the tree). KK> > KK> > Sometimes this leads to broken dependencies (e.g., when tracked port becomes KK> > dependent on some new port, or when dependency port moves). The latter case KK> > partially can be covered by tracking MOVED file, the former can not. KK> > KK> > Previously, `make index' would complaint about missing dependencies, so these KK> > ports can be caught. Now, with INDEX_JOBS parallel index building, these errors KK> > are hidden in the process. KK> KK> They should not be. Please provide evidence. Hmm, I cannot easily reproduce this error right now. Hopefully I'll start our internal package building system to 4.10-R this weekend, and possibly catch a case. Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------