From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Aug 24 21:20:15 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C14CBC41EA for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 21:20:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@woodcruft.co.uk) Received: from b.painless.aa.net.uk (b.painless.aa.net.uk [81.187.30.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 475581EDE for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 21:20:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@woodcruft.co.uk) Received: from woodcruft.co.uk ([81.187.49.114] helo=lime.woodcruft.co.uk) by b.painless.aa.net.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1bcfaf-0005rU-CL; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 22:20:05 +0100 Received: by lime.woodcruft.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D67F054B77; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 22:20:04 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 22:20:04 +0100 From: Frank Shute To: CK Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD/Xorg/Openchrome Segfault Message-ID: <20160824212004.GA33977@lime.woodcruft.co.uk> Reply-To: Frank Shute Mail-Followup-To: CK , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Face: *}~{PHnDTzvXPe'wl_-f%!@+r5; VLhb':*DsX%wEOPg\fDrXWQJf|2\,92"DdS%63t*BHDyQ|OWo@Gfjcd72eaN!4%NE{0]p)ihQ1MyFNtWL X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-PRERELEASE amd64 X-Organisation: 'woodcruft.co.uk' User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 21:20:15 -0000 On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 08:14:51AM -0800, CK wrote: > > The reason I asked the previous question to this list is: > > 1. It is difficult to believe a non-functional graphics driver > (openchrome) could get into the Xorg packaging system without > proper functioning being tested and verified. > > 2. It would appear to be an openchrome problem, but I thought > maybe it could be due to the GCC->Clang transition. You've made a whole pile of assumptions there that may or may not be true. Steve politely pitched it to you that you were using an archaic application on an archaic version of an OS for an architecture that not a lot of people use these days and you may be advised to upgrade your system and/or application software. I don't know why but I didn't receive a copy of your reply to him thanking him for his observations and spending his time on the matter. > > Anyway, this has totally 'screwed' my business, since all > machines use this driver, and none have a windowing system now. I'm sure you'll be happy to point out what contributions you or your business have made to FreeBSD. Feel free to post URLs of commits you have made to src, ports or docs. Any monetary contributions you have made to the Foundation or to port maintainers who maintain the ports your business depends on. Even answers to other user's questions on this list that you have made would be a start.... Until then: best of luck with your business! Toodle pip! -- Frank https://woodcruft.co.uk/