Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 21:47:57 -0800 From: "Gayn Winters" <gayn.winters@bristolsystems.com> To: "'Joel Hatton'" <freebsd-questions@auscert.org.au>, <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: securelevel doc? Message-ID: <001401c61fe0$9335cdb0$6501a8c0@workdog> In-Reply-To: <200601230452.k0N4qGVI080232@app.auscert.org.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Joel Hatton > Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2006 8:52 PM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: securelevel doc? > > > Hi, > > I may be confused, but istr that man security[7] used to document the > results of different kernel securelevels; this no longer > seems to be the > case. Is this still documented in the base system without recourse to > online help? (I'm OK with securelevels, btw, I'd just like to > know where > to point someone to this information) > > cheers, > > -- Joel Hatton -- I'd point to: man security man securelevel = man init man sysctl in this order. On my 5.3 system (the oldest I have running) the securelevels aren't fully explained until man init. I don't know about 4.x. -gayn Bristol Systems Inc. 714/532-6776 www.bristolsystems.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?001401c61fe0$9335cdb0$6501a8c0>