Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 12 Apr 2006 08:46:27 +0300
From:      Tuomo Latto <djv@mbnet.fi>
To:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Pros and Cons of amd64 (versus i386).
Message-ID:  <443C9433.3060800@mbnet.fi>
In-Reply-To: <20060409121624.iu6nwo6s680s8c4g@webmail.1command.com>
References:  <CBC0AAB4-EC80-44C8-BCCE-010DE99D4BC0@khera.org>	<E1FRVcq-0004pJ-4c@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk>	<20060406192950.GE700@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org>	<20060408203233.K67402@woozle.rinet.ru>	<20060408212421.GB720@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org>	<20060408160304.ek1xxodrkok4gw4g@webmail.1command.com>	<44384EB8.8090803@samsco.org> <20060409182254.GL41551@over-yonder.net> <20060409121624.iu6nwo6s680s8c4g@webmail.1command.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Chris H. wrote:
> Interesting to note (to me anyway) is my SCSI reports fastest on the outside
> whereas my (earlier reported) ATA reports faster in the center (middle).

You get better seek times on average in the center.
Maybe that affected your results?


-- 
Tuomo

... Nitpicking - not just a hobby, it's a way of life!




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?443C9433.3060800>