From owner-freebsd-current Thu Dec 21 14:18:05 1995 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id OAA15151 for current-outgoing; Thu, 21 Dec 1995 14:18:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from rocky.sri.MT.net (rocky.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.10]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA15142 for ; Thu, 21 Dec 1995 14:18:00 -0800 (PST) Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.sri.MT.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id PAA04267; Thu, 21 Dec 1995 15:20:19 -0700 Date: Thu, 21 Dec 1995 15:20:19 -0700 From: Nate Williams Message-Id: <199512212220.PAA04267@rocky.sri.MT.net> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: Andreas Klemm , Thomas Graichen , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pcnfsd.. In-Reply-To: <29652.819581550@time.cdrom.com> References: <29652.819581550@time.cdrom.com> Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > > I'd say yes to integrate this service, because it's a basic > > connectivity service. In this case a very small package, that > > doesn't cost many K's in the source tree. > > Actually, I have a confession to make. Ahem. This is very difficult. > I have come to (ooph, ack) agree with Paul! I think that the > ${local_startup} trick has potential and it should be the package that > drops its startup glue there. ... > I think the package specific junk should come out of sysconfig and the > other associated files in /etc. The current approach is simply a bad > idea and I'm sorry that I ever defended it. It's a great mechanism > for configuring the *base system* behavior, but no more than that. > The local config stuff is fat. Yay! We've come to an agreement. It *must* be the holidays or something. Nate