From owner-freebsd-isp  Wed Dec 11 04:55:38 1996
Return-Path: <owner-isp>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id EAA08500
          for isp-outgoing; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 04:55:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from absinthe.i3inc.com (absinthe.stonos.washington.dc.us [206.27.237.9])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id EAA08493
          for <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 04:55:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by absinthe.i3inc.com (8.7.2/8.7.2) with SMTP id HAA06455; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 07:53:56 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199612111253.HAA06455@absinthe.i3inc.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: absinthe.i3inc.com: Host localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol
To: bkogawa@primenet.com
Cc: vlad@dusk.net, freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Backup..
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 10 Dec 1996 22:28:45 -0800 (PST)"
References: <199612110628.WAA28001@foo.primenet.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.03 on Emacs 19.31.1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 07:53:54 -0500
From: Chris Shenton <chris@absinthe.i3inc.com>
Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Nice analysis. Where'd you get the DAT for < $400? Was this a one-off,
or continuing availability? Which model was it? 

The TR-3 or TR-4 solution seems like a good bang/buck ratio, but I'm
concerned about media stability. Any thoughts, anyone? 

Thanks.