From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 6 16:20:25 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C847E16A401 for ; Tue, 6 Feb 2007 16:20:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@obluda.cz) Received: from smtp1.kolej.mff.cuni.cz (smtp1.kolej.mff.cuni.cz [195.113.24.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C6B513C494 for ; Tue, 6 Feb 2007 16:20:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@obluda.cz) X-Envelope-From: dan@obluda.cz Received: from [10.20.0.26] (openvpn.ms.mff.cuni.cz [195.113.20.87]) by smtp1.kolej.mff.cuni.cz (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l16GKMKH046520 for ; Tue, 6 Feb 2007 17:20:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from dan@obluda.cz) Message-ID: <45C8AAC5.3060608@obluda.cz> Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 17:20:21 +0100 From: Dan Lukes User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.0.9) Gecko/20070203 SeaMonkey/1.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org References: <200702012319.l11NJJ7r065204@drugs.dv.isc.org> <45C2E612.5080002@FreeBSD.org> <45C3B56E.3060706@rxsec.com> <45C3DCA5.3070908@FreeBSD.org> <45C46EE5.4060404@obluda.cz> <200702031801.l13I1w2p096068@fire.jhs.private> <3aaaa3a0702060521t6586d67ag9352d81b8efe6f21@mail.gmail.com> <20070206144738.GW11375@elvandar.org> <200702061508.l16F8BQh063421@fire.jhs.private> <20070206152536.GX11375@elvandar.org> In-Reply-To: <20070206152536.GX11375@elvandar.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Support for 5.x (Was: Re: What about BIND 9.3.4 in FreeBSD in base system ?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 16:20:25 -0000 Remko Lodder napsal/wrote, On 02/06/07 16:25: > Well, given my "track-record" for the bugs, you can see that I and > some other committers try to wreak-havoc under the old PR's. This isn't > always simple and trivial to do, getting feedback takes ages from time > to time (logical because the submitter feels annoyed that it took so > long to get a reply at all) IMHO, the "annoyed" is not main problem. Submitter may not remeber the details after several months. In the fact, request for feedback may require almost complete re-analysis. Especially when submitter upgraded to new release in the meantime... Dan -- Dan Lukes SISAL MFF UK AKA: dan@obluda.cz, dan@freebsd.cz,dan@kolej.mff.cuni.cz