Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 01:26:59 +0100 From: Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de> To: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: powerpc@freebsd.org, mips@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org, jeff@freebsd.org, ia64@freebsd.org, arch@freebsd.org, sparc64@freebsd.org, arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Physbio changes final call for tests and reviews Message-ID: <20130212002659.GA22851@alchemy.franken.de> In-Reply-To: <20130202214709.GA99418@alchemy.franken.de> References: <20130202163322.GA2522@kib.kiev.ua> <20130202214709.GA99418@alchemy.franken.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 10:47:09PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote: > On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 06:33:22PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > Hi, > > I finished the last (insignificant) missed bits in the Jeff' physbio > > work. Now I am asking for the last round of testing and review, esp. for > > the !x86 architectures. Another testing focus are the SCSI HBAs and RAID > > controllers which drivers are changed by the patchset. Please do test > > this before the patchset is committed into HEAD ! > > > > The plan is to commit the patch somewhere in two weeks from this moment. > > The patch is required for the finalizing of the unmapped I/O work for UFS > > I did in parallel, which I hope to finish shortly after the commit. > > > > Patch is available at http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/misc/physbio.5.diff > > > > First tests on sparc64 with ata(4), mpt(4) and sym(4) look good (to > be sure I still need to test with a machine using a streaming buffer > in addition to the IOMMU, though). FYI, the latter case is also fine. Marius
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130212002659.GA22851>