From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 03:48:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 499B416A4CE for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 03:48:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from lilith.bellavista.cz (bellavista.worldonline.cz [212.90.245.154]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF42743D1F for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 03:48:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from neuhauser@bellavista.cz) Received: from freepuppy.bellavista.cz (freepuppy.bellavista.cz [10.0.0.10]) by lilith.bellavista.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FA302D; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 12:48:11 +0100 (CET) Received: by freepuppy.bellavista.cz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D37BB2FDA01; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 12:48:10 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 12:48:10 +0100 From: Roman Neuhauser To: "Marc G. Fournier" Message-ID: <20040213114810.GG7404@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> Mail-Followup-To: "Marc G. Fournier" , Michael Reifenberger , Craig Boston , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <200402091130.05656.craig@tobuj.gank.org> <20040209185105.O72949@fw.reifenberger.com> <20040212164236.D96890@ganymede.hub.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040212164236.D96890@ganymede.hub.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: Craig Boston cc: Michael Reifenberger cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Subversion/CVS experiment summary X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 11:48:14 -0000 # scrappy@hub.org / 2004-02-12 16:48:25 -0400: > On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Michael Reifenberger wrote: > > > Hi, > > first, this seems to be a good analysis of SVN and a good > > starting point for thinking about moving away from CVS. > > I missed the original thread here, so this point may have already been > made ... but ... we tried to use subversion for a project recently, and > made a *big* mistake of upgrading to a newer version from what we started > with ... and could no longer access the repository ... apparently there is > a 'dump / reload' procedure that we weren't aware of at the time, but this > is something that should be watched for ... dump/reload cycles required by a new version from time to time are announced prominently. -- If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore your message. see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html