From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Nov 7 21:42:17 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id VAA23329 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 7 Nov 1995 21:42:17 -0800 Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id VAA23318 for ; Tue, 7 Nov 1995 21:42:13 -0800 Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id WAA19254; Tue, 7 Nov 1995 22:37:58 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199511080537.WAA19254@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: ideas from netbsd To: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 1995 22:37:58 -0700 (MST) Cc: terry@lambert.org, nate@rocky.sri.MT.net, hackers@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <2626.815804322@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Nov 7, 95 08:18:42 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 844 Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > Building a FreeBSD thread-safe library instead of using the NetBSD > > effort toget JAVA running (they also heavily modified JAVA to *use* > > a user space threads, BTW) seems like NIH. > > Hardly! Building a FreeBSD thread-safe library gives you a > thread-safe library and JAVA. Implementing NetBSD support to give you > JAVA gives you only JAVA. I don't think it takes a rocket scientist > to figure out that "1 + 1 = 2" and "1 + 0 = 1" Building a FreeBSD thread-safe library gives you a thread-safe library. Taking NetBSD's work after it's done gives you a thread-safe library. I don't think it takes a rocket scientist to see the duplication of effort in doing the same thing twice. ;-). Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.