Date: 13 Dec 2002 12:53:05 -0800 From: Max Okumoto <okumoto@ucsd.edu> To: The Anarcat <anarcat@anarcat.ath.cx> Cc: Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de>, libh@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: libh Makefile.bm Makefile.new find_classes_descriptions.pl libh/bin module.m4 libh/bin/HuiQt_shared module.m4 libh/bin/HuiQt_static module.m4 libh/bin/HuiTvTest main.cc module.m4 libh/bin/HuiTv_shared ... Message-ID: <hfel8l63pq.fsf@multivac.sdsc.edu> In-Reply-To: <20021213004457.GB616@lenny.anarcat.ath.cx> References: <200212121309.gBCD9DN0065656@triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org> <20021212231208.GE76886@fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de> <hf1y4m7pb0.fsf@multivac.sdsc.edu> <20021213004457.GB616@lenny.anarcat.ath.cx>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I had stuff that was not check in just before the
crash of usw4.freebsd.org. And I kept working
and assumed that the cvs tree would come backup
soon.
o Cleaned up more of the Hui GUI/TUI stuff
o Made the Hui code compile with gcc32
o put some namespace stuff for std:: in to the code.
o Have a partial patch for tvision which allows
me to compile... but linking needs a few more
things.
Then the wedding happened... started a new job...
I am ok with reverting to a image before the last check in. Those
$Id$ really should not be in there.
I will try an redo the check in in smaller groups.
About the tag issue. I think tags are really usefull for keeping
repositories stable. If for instance we didn't have the backups
that you have it would be possible to revert all my changes via
the tag.
Tags are easy to create, and easy to remove. There is no significant
overhead for checkins or checkouts.
% cvs tag -d XXXX will remove the tag.
One thing that would prob help is if I put into the hackers file
a descriptition of what the tag represented.
If you want I can remove the tags that I have put in.
Max Okumoto
The Anarcat <anarcat@anarcat.ath.cx> writes:
> Ok. Don't worry Max, we'll get over it.
>
> Heck, I've seen much worse! :)
>
> Max, you are actually saying that the repo that was put on
> rtp.freebsd.org originally didn't match the one that was left on
> usw4.freebsd.org?
>
> Or did you continue working on usw4 without telling us? ;)
>
> At any rate, *what* were those changes? Needless to say I sure don't
> want to go through all the diffs to see what changed.
>
> As I said off-list, I'd prefer to revert the changes with a backup I
> have here than to complicate the matter by playing even more with tags
> and branches.
>
> What do you guys think?
>
> A.
>
> On Thu Dec 12, 2002 at 04:09:07PM -0800, Max Okumoto wrote:
> >
> > The original cvs repo that was on usw4.freebsd.org before
> > it was on rtp.FreeBSD.Org. I had work that was not checked.
> > After I merged in all the changes from the current CVS repo
> > I check in that work... but the rcs $Id$ stuff wasn't processed
> > correctly. And thus this huge message. If you look at it most
> > of the changes are 2+ 2-.
> >
> > Sigh.. I wanted to slowly get back into working on libh, but
> > it seams that instead of a quiet entry it was a huge crash.
> >
> > If you want to see the changes you can check via
> > % cvs diff -rBM_4 -rBM_5
> >
> > There are two tags; BM_4 before my checkin and BM_5 after my
> > check in.
> >
> > Max Okumoto
> >
> > Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de> writes:
> >
> > > > Check in all the changes since the previous CVS server crashed.
> > >
> > > What? Which prev. CVS Server? When did it crash??
> > >
> > > Does this mean we lost the history?
> > >
> > > Alex
> > >
> > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-libh" in the body of the message
> >
> > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> > with "unsubscribe freebsd-libh" in the body of the message
> >
>
>
> --
> Premature optimization is the root of all evil
> - Donald Knuth
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-libh" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?hfel8l63pq.fsf>