From owner-freebsd-current Thu Mar 26 21:40:58 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA00159 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Thu, 26 Mar 1998 21:40:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from zibbi.mikom.csir.co.za (zibbi.mikom.csir.co.za [146.64.24.58]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA00142 for ; Thu, 26 Mar 1998 21:40:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhay@zibbi.mikom.csir.co.za) Received: (from jhay@localhost) by zibbi.mikom.csir.co.za (8.8.8/8.8.7) id HAA12253; Fri, 27 Mar 1998 07:40:16 +0200 (SAT) From: John Hay Message-Id: <199803270540.HAA12253@zibbi.mikom.csir.co.za> Subject: Re: Still no news about CTM src-cur In-Reply-To: <199803270525.QAA01657@cimlogic.com.au> from John Birrell at "Mar 27, 98 04:25:17 pm" To: jb@cimlogic.com.au (John Birrell) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 1998 07:40:16 +0200 (SAT) Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > Anyway, I've asked Mark Murray to take Ulf's place if he can since Ulf > > is too busy to administer the CTM machine and Mark has been looking > > longer than anyone else in this discussion for something to do with > > his machine, so we'll give him first dibbs on this task. If he > > doesn't want it, we'll have to find another home for CTM. > > Now that we have cvsup, why is ctm necessary? Well I can think of two reasons. You only need email connectivity for it to be usefull and it is a lot cheaper (cpu and disk wise) on your server because it only have to figure out once what to do and then send everybody the same thing. John -- John Hay -- John.Hay@mikom.csir.co.za To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message