From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 28 19:07:22 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2710E428; Fri, 28 Nov 2014 19:07:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "troutmask", Issuer "troutmask" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06974787; Fri, 28 Nov 2014 19:07:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sASJ7Lk1071872 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 28 Nov 2014 11:07:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id sASJ7LT7071871; Fri, 28 Nov 2014 11:07:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 11:07:21 -0800 From: Steve Kargl To: Adrian Chadd Subject: Re: Possible bug in softfloat Message-ID: <20141128190721.GA71860@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20141128183416.GA71749@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-current X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 19:07:22 -0000 On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 10:54:25AM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 28 November 2014 at 10:34, Steve Kargl > wrote: > > In a thread on comp.lang.c, it was pointed out that softfloat > > has a bug and in checking src/lib/libc/softfloat I confimed > > the issue is present in FreeBSD. What I hae not confirmed > > is whether or not it is possible to hit this bug. In fact, > > it may only hit arm and mips. Anyway, here's the patch > > So we should just commit this? > I suspect the answer is yes, but I have no idea on how to trigger this code path. I also have no access to arm or mips hardware where the problem may manifest only. It may also be appropriate to have someone else confirm that the patch is indeed correct. -- steve