Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 23:08:22 +0200 From: Tijl Coosemans <tijl@ulyssis.org> To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Cc: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Michael Nottebrock <lofi@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: WINE vs. FreeBSD Message-ID: <200607272308.27425.tijl@ulyssis.org> In-Reply-To: <200607271121.17313.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <200607221914.15826.lofi@freebsd.org> <200607250358.21457.tijl@ulyssis.org> <200607271121.17313.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart2050574.CxlVPIfA9y Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 27 July 2006 17:21, John Baldwin wrote: > On Monday 24 July 2006 21:58, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > > However, Wine/Windows uses %fs for TLS and it appears that the > > FreeBSD kernel doesn't preserve it. It always ends up pointing to > > GUDATA_SEL. > > The kernel should preserve %fs across syscalls, traps, and faults.=20 > Can you point to a specific case where %fs is not preserved? It > sounds like %fs is never set to a value in Wine. Yes, it was a combination of compiler optimizations and an inline=20 assembly block missing __volatile__. --nextPart2050574.CxlVPIfA9y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBEyStLdMR2xnarec8RAqZ7AJ9GAvaccJ2AOXet7rLSJHpSLSzolwCfUrMf 4KQ0DZCCpmV+5bxq6uXCv4M= =Ndp6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2050574.CxlVPIfA9y--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200607272308.27425.tijl>