From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 14 17:05:52 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDB0616A4CE for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 17:05:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from engine140.deployzone.net (engine140.deployzone.net [193.17.85.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 13E2043D48 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 17:05:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@czv.com) Received: from adsl-212-90-218-5.cybernet.ch [212.90.218.5] by engine140.deployzone.net; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 18:05:08 +0100 In-Reply-To: <4210C5A0.9040004@401.cx> References: <736EAA55-5B8B-11D9-ACB2-000A95C969C6@zumbrunn.com><20050102110732.GB861@zaphod.nitro.dk><20050103232207.GA44980@gothmog.gr><9FC79942-5DE3-11D9-BEAB-000A95C969C6@zumbrunn.com><517329304.20050213155432@wanadoo.fr><420FB80B.7040209@nbritton.org> <420FD36F.7050302@nbritton.org> <42106B6A.9030109@nbritton.org> <42108DE6.4000706@401.cx> <4210B0F0.4040508@401.cx> <3bc9c97926da594f36a01a8804445a73@czv.com> <4210C5A0.9040004@401.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <2a164d875d9e71d8cd3b4f209726256f@czv.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chris Zumbrunn Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 18:05:50 +0100 To: "Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2) cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Rework of theFreeBSDwebsite[was:FreeBSD'sVisualIdentity:Outdated?] X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 17:05:52 -0000 On Feb 14, 2005, at 4:37 PM, Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg wrote: > Chris Zumbrunn wrote: >> On Feb 14, 2005, at 3:08 PM, Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg wrote: >>> What the *word* trademark has to do with this discussion I do not >>> understand. We have afaik never been discussing the name of the >>> project, have we? >> Because the FreeBSD project owns trademarks for the word "FREEBSD" it >> doesn't need to protect a specific graphical design. > > If the specific graphical design is the official logo of FreeBSD, it > should of course be protected. Why? That money is better spent extending the trademark of the word "FREEBSD" to additional jurisdictions. /czv