Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 13:15:54 -0600 From: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> To: tlambert2@mindspring.com Cc: j mckitrick <jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org>, freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sysadminmag update Message-ID: <3B59D4EA.D16322D7@softweyr.com> References: <20010720030757.A7504@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <3B585CC8.480BA14D@mindspring.com> <20010720174929.A17080@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <3B592F01.D9ED5404@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Terry Lambert wrote: > > j mckitrick wrote: > > > > here it is: > > > > http://www.sysadminmag.com/articles/2001/0108/0108q/0108q.htm > > The "tuning" they did for the sockets and other things > is still wrong; most of those things are impossible to > set at anything other than boot time. The numbers will > go up, but the available number of objects sitting in > the allocation pools will not. Which is why I told them to configure and build a new kernel, advice they completely ignored. As I wrote earlier, this article had a foregone conclusion (Linux roolz) and we're not going to change their minds about that. Can we please stop trying to teach the pig to sing? -- "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?" Wes Peters Softweyr LLC wes@softweyr.com http://softweyr.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3B59D4EA.D16322D7>