Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 22:51:53 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: sparc@freebsd.org Cc: Luke Hollins <lwh@pathcom.com> Subject: Re: Ultra 1 Message-ID: <xzpn0ka4x6u.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <20030304180119.GA85594@dragon.nuxi.com> ("David O'Brien"'s message of "Tue, 4 Mar 2003 10:01:19 -0800") References: <xzp3cm3coiq.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <Pine.BSF.4.50.0303040745220.93132-100000@phoenix.zer0.net> <20030304180119.GA85594@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> writes: > The difference between a U1 and a U1e is 1. NIC: 10/100Mbit hme(4) vs. > 10Mbit Lance, 2. fas wide scsi. The U1e has the NIC and SCSI of a U2. > U1e (and U2) are supported for diskless only. scottl is working on > fas(4) for u2/u1e. The U of O has a bunch of old Ultras: plain Ultra 1s, at least one Ultra Enterprise 1, Ultra 1 Creators, Ultra 1 Creator3Ds, Ultra 5s and a handful of Ultra 10s. The only ones with 10 Mbps NICs are the very oldest plain 1s and the Enterprise. All the others have happymeals. I suspect the truth here is closer to "David's U1 has a Lance NIC and narrow SCSI controller" than to "all non-Enterprise U1s have Lance NICs and narrow SCSI controllers" In any case, I have at a spare happymeal NIC (two if I decomission my SS20 or downgrade it to the onboard Lance), so this is not an issue. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-sparc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpn0ka4x6u.fsf>