From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 29 20:37:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A33C416A4CE for ; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 20:37:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from saturn.criticalmagic.com (saturn.criticalmagic.com [68.213.16.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DFE343D1D for ; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 20:37:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from richardcoleman@mindspring.com) Received: from mindspring.com (titan.criticalmagic.com [68.213.16.23]) by saturn.criticalmagic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B10A83BD2A; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 23:37:51 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4042BE2C.3070703@mindspring.com> Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 23:38:04 -0500 From: Richard Coleman Organization: Critical Magic, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christopher Vance References: <20040301011147.GE20621@aurema.com> In-Reply-To: <20040301011147.GE20621@aurema.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADSUP!!! USB MFC committed.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: richardcoleman@mindspring.com List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 04:37:52 -0000 Christopher Vance wrote: > On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 05:01:28PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > >> The USB code in RELENG_4 has been updated to match that in -current. >> Please test any USB devices that are critical to you BEFORE we release >> 4.10 :-) > > > > Would the effort to keep making 4.X releases be better spent making > 5.X stable, or are the two efforts not competing for the same > developer resources? > Keeping the code bases closer together will probably make development easier, not harder. Also, this USB code will now be tested on more hardware before the release of 4.10 or 5.3. I wouldn't be surprised if someone running -stable on strange hardware finds a bug that needs fixing on both -stable and -current. Seems like a win/win to me. Richard Coleman richardcoleman@mindspring.com