From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 13 19:09:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE752106566B for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 19:09:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rysto32@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41DD08FC1B for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 19:09:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyf6 with SMTP id 6so1047201eyf.13 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:09:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=jZEWNqS5/y3N5qRH110kzukUxWJw1aytUyCZKIKXB2w=; b=aiRFMPjKdNxaoJBkq+2USLI1dhfOhOvqzlx4Mq3DjIyVpixeyajHVV9iel2E2v0Gq9 C6GruL10OsYBVEU16BBxNf9SFUfiM98AEDfN8d9/dVnrEoNWv5PJnMKHW/f2uGgkXIYq g9lbGZnVQaQRV2GbUArjmXNZ45SYKKyDeIapI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=Ior77w0TqCgO02aqjj9I2o+0lL6QV6zcI92j2AtN+35tdZmvcTJvqtS2l7Kj8jsKzj BjaFejYwZeReUnEtSJ1Ssm4T/+PlRVcX2PbamZq2ZwjLEq4fdi+toOJfm6flWmB+JwHU 5dtdotEw3kaulCQEfF188OnwAMkl+aHUlfpj0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.10.143 with SMTP id p15mr49705ebp.0.1294945761159; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:09:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.22.14 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:09:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20110113.195806.74699536.sthaug@nethelp.no> References: <20110113.151652.104127547.sthaug@nethelp.no> <20110113.195806.74699536.sthaug@nethelp.no> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 14:09:21 -0500 Message-ID: From: Ryan Stone To: sthaug@nethelp.no Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Intel 10GBase-LR Ethernet card detected as 10GBase-SR X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 19:09:22 -0000 As near as I can tell, the SR version of the X520 is going to be the same card, only with an SR SFP+ installed.