Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 19:52:30 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: netpbm-Port Message-ID: <20030716195230.062849d8.Alexander@Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <20030716150546.GD1239@mails.so.argh.org> References: <20030716150546.GD1239@mails.so.argh.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 17:05:47 +0200
Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org> wrote:
Please keep ports@ in CC.
> at debian we're having problems with netpbm. This includes:
> - the many different licences that need permanent licence auditing
We don't have such a strict policy about licenses as debian has, so this
isn't such an important issue for us. We handle the important issues
(e.g. the netpbm package doesn't get shipped on CDs because we aren't
allowed to sell it), but we don't care that much about the differences
in "free beer" vs. "free speech" as debian does.
> - unwillingness to use manpages
> - inconsistent interface
Both points aren't nice, but we don't have the same quality policy for
3rd party programs as we have for the base system. We provide what we
get, it's up to the user to install and use 3rd party programs or not.
If the user thinks he can handle the netpbm suite: fine; if not: it's ok
for us too.
Bye,
Alexander.
--
The dark ages were caused by the Y1K problem.
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net
GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030716195230.062849d8.Alexander>