From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Jan 3 14:55:02 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA18038 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Sun, 3 Jan 1999 14:55:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from istari.home.net (cc158233-a.catv1.md.home.com [24.3.25.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA18015 for ; Sun, 3 Jan 1999 14:55:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sjr@home.net) Received: (from sjr@localhost) by istari.home.net (8.9.1/8.8.6) id RAA04742; Sun, 3 Jan 1999 17:54:31 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1999 17:54:31 -0500 (EST) From: "Stephen J. Roznowski" Message-Id: <199901032254.RAA04742@istari.home.net> To: brian@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU Subject: Re: Why is root's crontab different? In-Reply-To: Mail from '"Brian W. Buchanan" ' dated: Sun, 3 Jan 1999 14:43:58 -0800 (PST) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > From: "Brian W. Buchanan" > > On Sun, 3 Jan 1999, Stephen J. Roznowski wrote: > > In tracking down the cause of my "/var/log/maillog.0: No such file > > or directory" errors from newsyslog, I "discovered" that I had both > > a root crontab entry and /etc/crontab. Both of these were running > > newsyslog at the same time and they were conflicting with each > > other. > > > > My question is why is root's crontab entry treated differently (i.e. > > a file in /etc) as opposed to just having a crontab (in /var/cron/tabs)? > > /etc/crontab allows you to specify the user who commands should be run as I understand the difference, but why would this be better than installing crontabs for the various (system) users? (for example, news). -SR To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message