From owner-cvs-all  Mon Jun 11  3:58:51 2001
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from kalaid.f2f.com.ua (kalaid.f2f.com.ua [62.149.0.33])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id DF39437B403; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 03:58:31 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sobomax@mail-in.net)
Received: from Mail-In.Net (borey.f2f.com.ua [62.149.0.24])
	by kalaid.f2f.com.ua (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f5BB08140603;
	Mon, 11 Jun 2001 14:00:08 +0300 (EEST)
	(envelope-from sobomax@mail-in.net)
Received: from vega.vega.com (root@das0-l99.uic-in.net [212.35.189.226])
	by Mail-In.Net (8.11.3/8.H.Z) with ESMTP id f5BAwpF05679;
	Mon, 11 Jun 2001 13:58:54 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from FreeBSD.org (big_brother.vega.com [192.168.1.1])
	by vega.vega.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f5BAvwM09035;
	Mon, 11 Jun 2001 13:57:58 +0300 (EEST)
	(envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org)
Message-ID: <3B24A434.AC014C07@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 13:57:56 +0300
From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG>
Organization: Vega International Capital
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en,uk,ru
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net>
Cc: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@FreeBSD.ORG>,
	cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/samba-devel Makefile 
 ports/net/samba-devel/filespatch-ba
References: <35586.992256011@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <cvs-all.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=subscribe%20cvs-all>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=unsubscribe%20cvs-all>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Sheldon Hearn wrote:

> On Mon, 11 Jun 2001 13:35:57 +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
>
> > Yes, but in this case *nothing* is changed in the behaviour of the
> > package, because bento knows nothing about WITH_CUPS option, therefore
> > packages built after the change will be exactly the same as ones built
> > before.
>
> Oh I see.  So if I enable a feature that wasn't enabled before, or
> disable one that was, it's okay for me to bump PORTREVISION?

Yes, this should be OK.

-Maxim


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message