Date: Mon, 29 May 2000 20:57:33 -0500 (CDT) From: Steve Price <sprice@hiwaay.net> To: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/18894: xv build fails Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.4.21.0005292051590.6312-100000@fly.HiWAAY.net> In-Reply-To: <20000530095254.A12216@wantadilla.lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 30 May 2000, Greg Lehey wrote: # Well, I've worked around it. I found rman in /usr/local/bin and # /usr/X11R6/bin--don't ask me how they got there: # # -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 92524 Mar 13 07:54 /usr/local/bin/rman # -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 95704 May 14 18:22 /usr/X11R6/bin/rman According to a quick grep the first one can only come from the textproc/rman. Do you have that port installed? The latter instance of rman appears to have come from one of the KDE ports (kdebase11?). Question is why would imake and friends care about rman when neither of the XFree86 ports install it according to their PLISTs? # I modified the Makefile to point to the first one, and the install # worked. The reference came from: # # # rules: $XFree86: xc/config/cf/Imake.rules,v 3.72 2000/04/05 18:13:07 dawes Exp $ Where did this come from? The XFree86-4 port? My Imake.rules file is quite different from this. In fact it doesn't contain any of the stuff below. I'm using 3.3.6. # TOP = . # CURRENT_DIR = . # RMAN = $(TOP)/config/util/rman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.OSF.4.21.0005292051590.6312-100000>