From owner-freebsd-ports Mon May 29 18:57:43 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mail.hiwaay.net (fly.HiWAAY.net [208.147.154.56]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F121737B61C for ; Mon, 29 May 2000 18:57:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sprice@hiwaay.net) Received: from localhost (sprice@localhost) by mail.hiwaay.net (8.11.0.Beta1/8.11.0.Beta1) with ESMTP id e4U1vXY31654; Mon, 29 May 2000 20:57:33 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 29 May 2000 20:57:33 -0500 (CDT) From: Steve Price To: Greg Lehey Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/18894: xv build fails In-Reply-To: <20000530095254.A12216@wantadilla.lemis.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 30 May 2000, Greg Lehey wrote: # Well, I've worked around it. I found rman in /usr/local/bin and # /usr/X11R6/bin--don't ask me how they got there: # # -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 92524 Mar 13 07:54 /usr/local/bin/rman # -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 95704 May 14 18:22 /usr/X11R6/bin/rman According to a quick grep the first one can only come from the textproc/rman. Do you have that port installed? The latter instance of rman appears to have come from one of the KDE ports (kdebase11?). Question is why would imake and friends care about rman when neither of the XFree86 ports install it according to their PLISTs? # I modified the Makefile to point to the first one, and the install # worked. The reference came from: # # # rules: $XFree86: xc/config/cf/Imake.rules,v 3.72 2000/04/05 18:13:07 dawes Exp $ Where did this come from? The XFree86-4 port? My Imake.rules file is quite different from this. In fact it doesn't contain any of the stuff below. I'm using 3.3.6. # TOP = . # CURRENT_DIR = . # RMAN = $(TOP)/config/util/rman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message