From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 22 18:27:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE26216A452; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 18:27:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (nagual.pp.ru [194.87.13.69]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F98143D64; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 18:27:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (ache@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nagual.pp.ru (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1MIR1Jf019443; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 21:27:01 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: (from ache@localhost) by nagual.pp.ru (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1MIR1TT019442; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 21:27:01 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache) Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 21:27:01 +0300 From: Andrey Chernov To: John Baldwin Message-ID: <20060222182701.GA19397@nagual.pp.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Andrey Chernov , John Baldwin , Kris Kennaway , current@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200602211047.06599.jhb@freebsd.org> <200602221101.41027.jhb@freebsd.org> <20060222162046.GA16663@nagual.pp.ru> <200602221205.40160.jhb@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200602221205.40160.jhb@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: [PATCH] possible fix for the runtime going backwards warnings X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 18:27:16 -0000 On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 12:05:37PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > On Wednesday 22 February 2006 11:20, Andrey Chernov wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 11:01:39AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > > > Is it more or less than before the patch? Also, what happens if you just back > > > > Less than (for me). > > So the patch was a net improvement? Yes. -- http://ache.pp.ru/