From owner-freebsd-questions  Tue Jan  2 11:33: 2 2001
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jan  2 11:32:59 2001
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from po4.wam.umd.edu (po4.wam.umd.edu [128.8.10.166])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2505A37B402
	for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue,  2 Jan 2001 11:32:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rac5.wam.umd.edu (IDENT:root@rac5.wam.umd.edu [128.8.10.145])
	by po4.wam.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA01949;
	Tue, 2 Jan 2001 14:32:49 -0500 (EST)
Received: from rac5.wam.umd.edu (IDENT:sendmail@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by rac5.wam.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA25892;
	Tue, 2 Jan 2001 14:32:48 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (culverk@localhost)
	by rac5.wam.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA25887;
	Tue, 2 Jan 2001 14:32:48 -0500 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: rac5.wam.umd.edu: culverk owned process doing -bs
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2001 14:32:48 -0500 (EST)
From: Kenneth Wayne Culver <culverk@wam.umd.edu>
To: Gustavo Vieira Goncalves Coelho Rios <gustavo@ifour.com.br>
Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: weird route in routing table
In-Reply-To: <3A521CC2.2D33818A@ifour.com.br>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0101021430180.25018-100000@rac5.wam.umd.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Well, on my computer, with 2 interfaces:

culverk:~:> ifconfig
xl0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
        inet 192.168.0.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255
        ether 00:01:02:3e:18:41 
        media: autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>) status: active
        supported media: autoselect 100baseTX <full-duplex> 100baseTX
10baseT/UTP <full-duplex> 10baseT/UTP 100baseTX <hw-loopback>
de0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
        inet 129.2.211.24 netmask 0xffffff80 broadcast 129.2.211.127
        ether 00:c0:f0:1f:21:02 
        media: autoselect (10baseT/UTP) status: active
        supported media: autoselect 100baseTX <full-duplex> 100baseTX
10baseT/UTP <full-duplex> 10baseT/UTP
lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 16384
        inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000

the same behavior is noticed on my computer as well.

=================================================================
| Kenneth Culver              | FreeBSD: The best NT upgrade    |
| Unix Systems Administrator  | ICQ #: 24767726                 |
| and student at The          | AIM: muythaibxr                 |
| The University of Maryland, | Website: (Under Construction)   |
| College Park.	              | http://www.wam.umd.edu/~culverk/|
=================================================================

On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Gustavo Vieira Goncalves Coelho Rios wrote:

> Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote:
> > 
> > I would think your problem is because that interface is on your local
> > machine so anything that goes to that ip doesn't need to go through
> > fxp0... it's faster to just go through the loopback interface.
> 
> Yeah! It's on my local machine! But from your reply could not realize if
> it's a problem or not!
> 
> Is this the way FreeBSD do with local ip address ?
> 
> thanks!
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
> 



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message