From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Dec 30 11:46:49 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36A3816A4CE
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 30 Dec 2003 11:46:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dmz2.unixjunkie.com (adsl-65-70-175-250.dsl.rcsntx.swbell.net
	[65.70.175.250])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93E0E43D55
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 30 Dec 2003 11:46:45 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from strgout@unixjunkie.com)
Received: from mail.unixjunkie.com (mail [10.253.254.36])
	by dmz2.unixjunkie.com (8.12.8p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hBUKFdYe079028
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 30 Dec 2003 14:15:39 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from strgout@mail.unixjunkie.com)
Received: from mail.unixjunkie.com (mail [10.253.254.36])
	by mail.unixjunkie.com (8.12.8p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hBUKFdKf079025
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 30 Dec 2003 14:15:39 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from strgout@mail.unixjunkie.com)
Received: (from strgout@localhost)
	by mail.unixjunkie.com (8.12.8p2/8.12.8/Submit) id hBUKFdbE079024
	for freebsd-security@freebsd.org;
	Tue, 30 Dec 2003 14:15:39 -0600 (CST)	(envelope-from strgout)
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 14:15:39 -0600
From: John <strgout@unixjunkie.com>
To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20031230201538.GA78996@mail.unixjunkie.com>
References: <20031222184812.87890.qmail@web60808.mail.yahoo.com>
	<20031222201341.GA98235@FreeBSD.org.ua>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20031222201341.GA98235@FreeBSD.org.ua>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Subject: Re: interface bonding
X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting]
	<freebsd-security.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>,
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>,
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 19:46:49 -0000

On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 10:13:41PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 10:48:12AM -0800, Richard Bejtlich wrote:
> > Thanks to Dmitry's tip on ng_eiface, I'm happy to
> > report using the following configuration to bond
> > interfaces with ng_one2many and a virtual interface
> > ngeth0.
> > 
> > sf2 and sf3 are real interfaces connected to my 10/100
> > tap.
> > --
> > kldload ng_ether
> > kldload ng_one2many
> > ifconfig sf2 promisc -arp up
> > ifconfig sf3 promisc -arp up
> > ngctl mkpeer . eiface hook ether
> > ngctl mkpeer ngeth0: one2many lower one
> > ngctl connect sf2: ngeth0:lower lower many0
> > ngctl connect sf3: ngeth0:lower lower many1
> > ifconfig ngeth0 -arp up
> > --
> > 
> > It works:
> > 
> You can also try to dispense with ng_ether(4) completely
> by attaching the "ether" hook of the eiface node to the
> one2many's "one" hook directly.
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> -- 
> Ruslan Ermilov
> FreeBSD committer
> ru@FreeBSD.org

Sorry netgraph is a little over my head on config, can you show an example?